Re-membering
From Margeret Heath’s Re-membering · reconstructed by AI
Question 6 of 6 · Actions
Who does what?
Actions, and what each should achieve.
- Statements
- 15
- Connections
- 6
- Open questions
- 2
How to read it. Read from the bottom up: each action should produce the effect above it.
Action 1 of 5
Map what regulates whom
Illustrative condition and action, not an observation or assigned task. A willing host would identify its relationships, tools and routines. Later assessments feed back into this inquiry without assuming that the original problem recurs.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have a shared picture of what regulates whom.From Margeret Heath
- Expected effectParticipants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using their assessments.From Margeret Heath
↺ feeds back to Map the relationships, tools and routines that regulate people in the chosen situation.
Beyond this part · 1 link
- Participants share a picture of what regulates whom. produces The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria. in “Agree the purpose and participation arrangements”
Action 2 of 5
Agree the purpose and participation arrangements
A shared picture supports agreeing desired effects, observable criteria, consent and withdrawal. The action requires willing participants and workable arrangements, not agreement with the author’s ontology.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a shared picture of what regulates whom.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionThe shared picture does not yet supply an agreed aim or participation arrangements.From Margeret Heath
- ActionAgree desired effects, observable criteria, consent and ways to opt out.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 4 links
- The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria. produces People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain. in “Offer a small practice people can change or leave”
- The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria. produces People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool. in “Review one tool and enable practical choice”
- Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out. puts into practice Participants agree observable criteria for benefit and harm. First steps
- Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out. puts into practice Consent, withdrawal and harm response are usable. First steps
Action 3 of 5
Offer a small practice people can change or leave
With the purpose and participation arrangements in place, a host could offer an optional pause or check-in and a way to report strain. This can proceed alongside the tool review.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have a voluntary opportunity for attunement and a way to report strain.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionThe existing routines provide little protected opportunity for connection and repair.From Margeret Heath
- ActionOffer one optional pause or check-in that participants can change or leave.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain. produces Participants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using assessments. in “Listen to benefits, harms and surprises, then retune”
- Offer an optional pause or check-in that people can change or leave. puts into practice Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave. The change
Action 4 of 5
Review one tool and enable practical choice
With the same agreed purpose, participants could inspect one tool and seek explanation, privacy protection and override. This branch does not depend on completing the shared-practice branch.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have greater awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionA selected tool anticipates needs in ways participants cannot readily inspect or change.From Margeret Heath
- ActionReview that tool with participants and enable explanation, privacy protection and override.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool. produces Participants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using assessments. in “Listen to benefits, harms and surprises, then retune”
- Review the tool and enable explanation, privacy and override. puts into practice The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible. First steps
Action 5 of 5
Listen to benefits, harms and surprises, then retune
The illustrative branches come together for assessment. Ask what helped, harmed or surprised people and revise or stop; the cycle has no assigned owner, agreed feedback provider or recorded result.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using their assessments.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a voluntary opportunity for attunement and a way to report strain.From Margeret Heath
- Expected effectParticipants have greater awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionThe benefits and harms of the proposed changes remain uncertain.From Margeret Heath
- ActionAsk what helped, harmed or surprised participants, then revise or stop the changes.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- Participants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using assessments. feeds back to Map the relationships, tools and routines that regulate people. in “Map what regulates whom”
- Ask what helped, harmed or surprised people, then revise or stop. puts into practice Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps. First steps
Where this comes from
In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a transition tree. How a commons works →